
Most research examining the effectiveness of National Board certification rely on data from standardized tests. These tests vary by state and many would argue are no more than simple multiple choice tests that fail to assess higher level thinking skills. This raises many questions. Do these standardized tests capture the teaching quality of teachers who can help students learn content on a much deeper level? How generalizable are the findings of the research when making decisions on a local or school level?
From an academic point of view, this ambiguity is terrific for justifying more research. For practioners, this ambiguity may lead to confusion, misunderstanding, or maybe even misrepresentation.
David Cohen writes a good summary of the presentation here on Teacher Magazine.
Archive for July, 2009
18
Jul




